Armed British soldiers in steel helmets climb the stone steps of the Old City of Jerusalem to impose a curfew, October 1938
Jerusalem, 19 October 1938 - British troops move into the Old City to impose a curfew during the Arab Revolt, the rebellion the army spent three years suppressing before the 1939 White Paper. G. Eric Matson · Government Press Office / National Photo Collection of Israel · public domain · Wikimedia Commons
Union flag

Play as · WW2 1939 · L1 · British Mandate

British Mandate of Palestine - September 1, 1939

The British Mandate of Palestine in 1939 is the hardest ground in the empire - a territory Britain governs under a League of Nations mandate that has committed it to two promises it cannot keep at once. The Balfour Declaration's pledge of a Jewish national home and the parallel promises to the Arab majority have produced not a compromise but a collision, and by 1939 that collision is a war of its own. The Arab Revolt of 1936-39, a mass rebellion against British rule and Jewish immigration, is only now being crushed by the army after three years of guerrilla fighting, collective punishment and thousands of dead. On its heels comes the May 1939 White Paper, London's attempt to buy Arab quiet on the eve of a European war by capping Jewish immigration to seventy-five thousand over five years and then ending it - a policy that lands, catastrophically, in the exact year that the Jews of Europe most need somewhere to go. The strategic identity is the mandate as trap: Britain holding the ring between two national movements, having just fought one and now betraying the other, with the whole insoluble knot pulled tight in the last months before the world war begins.

Starting position

The starting board is a mandate held down by force after three years of rebellion, its administration governing a country that does not accept being one. Order rests on a large British garrison - reinforced far beyond peacetime strength to break the revolt - working alongside the Palestine Police, the Transjordan Frontier Force and, quietly, the Jewish auxiliary formations that the emergency has drawn into British service. The economy is split along the same fault line as the politics: a rapidly modernising Jewish sector of citrus exports, industry around Tel Aviv and Haifa, and the institutions of a state-in-waiting in the Jewish Agency and the Histadrut; and an Arab sector of agriculture, the coastal towns and a leadership shattered by the revolt's defeat and the exile of the Mufti. Haifa's port and refinery and the pipeline from Iraqi oil make the territory strategically valuable to Britain in a coming war quite apart from its politics. Society is two communities and two national projects occupying the same land with almost no shared institutions - the Yishuv organising toward statehood and now toward resistance against the White Paper, the Arab majority defeated in the field and betrayed at the table. The pieces are the garrison, the port and pipeline, two parallel economies and a conflict the administration contains but cannot end.

What turns the campaign

What Britain wants from Palestine in 1939 is quiet - a pacified rear area, a secure Haifa, and Arab goodwill across the whole Middle East as it goes to war with Germany - and the White Paper is its bid to buy all three at the Yishuv's expense. What the war forces is an impossible three-way bind. The Arab leadership, crushed and embittered, is offered a policy it can no longer credit from a power it has just fought. The Jewish community faces the White Paper's immigration cap at the precise moment European Jewry is being driven toward destruction, producing the wrenching wartime posture David Ben-Gurion frames exactly: fight the war against Hitler as if there were no White Paper, and fight the White Paper as if there were no war. And Britain must hold the territory as a strategic base while alienating one side by fighting it and the other by restricting it. The campaign turns on how the mandatory power spends this contradiction: how hard it enforces the immigration cap against illegal Jewish immigration and the underground that runs it, how far it trusts and arms the Yishuv against a possible Axis advance through the Middle East, and whether any move it makes toward one community can be made without inflaming the other. There is no settling move on the board - only the management of a conflict whose sharpest phase is still ahead.

Signature challenge

The mandate that governs a war

The British Mandate of Palestine's defining condition in 1939 is that it is not a colony to be developed but a conflict to be contained. Britain does not rule a people here so much as stand, heavily armed, between two peoples who each claim the whole country - having promised the land to both and being able to deliver it to neither. NationFall surfaces this as the Palestine campaign's central tension: a player handed the mandatory power's authority at the worst possible moment, the Arab Revolt just suppressed and the White Paper just published, and asked to hold a strategically vital territory while every available policy deepens the very antagonism it is meant to calm. The immigration cap that placates the Arabs condemns Jewish refugees; the national home that answers the Yishuv enrages the Arab majority; the force that keeps order feeds the grievance of both. The deepest fact of the position is that Palestine offers no victory condition of the ordinary kind - the two national movements the mandate straddles are moving toward a reckoning that no amount of good administration can prevent, and the player's real task is to govern a country that is already, quietly, at war with itself.

Try the British Mandate of Palestine campaign

Free demo. Pick WW2. Pick Mandate Palestine. Two national movements, one country, and a mandate that can satisfy neither.

Play Free Demo as British Mandate of Palestine

Regional: Transjordan · British Egypt · French Syria - see the WW2 1939 scenario hub

All nations · WW2 1939 scenario